Semiweb
Back to Nagano

Nagano

Manage the entire ethics review process, from submission to decision.

Nagano structures ethics review around your institution's rules, committees and project types, from the initial submission through to the decision, together with the official documents it produces.

Conceptual illustration of the ethics review process: a submitted project, a committee and its reviewers, a review, structured requests for clarification, and then a decision.

A process shaped around your organization

Committees and rules that reflect your reality.

Every institution runs ethics review through its own committees, rules and project types. Nagano supports that process without imposing a single structure.

You define the committees, the people responsible and the rules that apply; Nagano carries them through the file.

Configurable evaluation offices

  • Configurable committees

    Define the committees, their members and their responsibilities to match your organization.

  • Rules and project types

    Set the rules that apply to each project type and each stage.

  • Integration with your offices

    Attach the process to the offices that receive and take charge of projects.

A complete, structured process

From submission to decision.

The file follows a clear path, with the right tools at each step. Requests for clarification are structured: they become a form or are applied to an official document, never exchanged in free-form discussion.

  1. Submission and initiation

    The project is submitted and the evaluation process starts under the applicable rules.

  2. Committee and reviewers

    The file is routed to the relevant committee and reviewers.

  3. Review

    The analysis draws on the grids, the documents and the formal exchanges with the research team.

  4. Decision

    The decision is documented, communicated and kept in the file.

Tools that fit the file

Forms, grids and official documents, all integrated.

Forms and review grids are adapted to the project types and rules of your institution.

Requests for clarification follow a structured format and the responses are integrated into the file. Official documents are produced according to the process, and the file's history is kept.

  • Form adapted to the project type

    The researcher provides the information expected for that project type.

  • Review grid

    Reviewers document their analysis on a grid adapted to the review.

  • Request for clarification

    Raised as a structured form, never as free-form discussion.

  • Official document

    Letters, protocols or decisions produced according to the process.

File history

Stages, decisions and documents stay kept with the project.

According to your rules and project types

Support every type of research project.

Nagano can support different ethics review processes according to your project types and your institution's rules. Not every project requires ethics review: Nagano adapts to what your rules provide for.

  • Human research

    Projects involving human participants and the reviews specific to them.

  • Animal research

    Projects involving animals and the requirements specific to that research.

  • Other project types

    Any other project your rules subject to ethics review.

Traceability and follow-up

Straightforward, secure management.

Every file stays available, with access defined by role and deadlines tracked through to the decision.

  • Complete history

    Stages, decisions and documents stay kept with the project.

  • Role-based access

    Everyone gets the access that matches their role in the process.

  • Reminders and deadlines

    Deadlines and reminders support follow-up through to the decision.